The National Human Rights Defense Network (RNDDH) is speaking out against the November 19, 2025, ruling by the Port-au-Prince Court of Appeal in favor of Romel Bell, the former Director General of the General Administration of Customs (AGD). In a scathing report, the organization labeled the decision a “judicial parody” and urged the Superior Council of the Judicial Power (CSPJ) to investigate the magistrates involved. The case centers on alleged corruption, including money laundering, terrorism financing, and illicit enrichment.
The RNDDH argues that the court acted ultra petita by granting the defendants more than they requested and focusing on formal irregularities—specifically an issue with a signature—rather than the merits of the case. Previously, investigating judge Jean Wilner Morin had found sufficient evidence to prosecute Bell, his wife, and Reverend Duckens Augustin, citing an asset growth estimated at 748% above Bell’s legitimate income. Investigations by the Anti-Corruption Unit (ULCC) uncovered 13 undeclared bank accounts and the alleged diversion of funds from the Renmen Timoun organization to pay for the Bell family’s personal expenses.
The rights group also condemned the “nonchalance” of the public prosecutor’s office for failing to appeal the decision to the Court of Cassation. According to the RNDDH, this ruling deals a fatal blow to the fight against corruption in Haiti’s public administration and further weakens public trust in a fragile legal system. The organization maintains that Haitian justice currently remains the greatest obstacle to financial accountability and transparency.
